News and Insights

Back
November 2, 2026

Tax-Efficient Investing for High-Income Investors

Written by: Nathan Lee, CFP®
‍
Share this article Facebook LinkedIn Email

Key Takeaways

  • Rental properties are just one option to tax efficiency. Tax-efficient investing can also include ETFs, direct indexing, and professionally managed real estate and infrastructure funds.
  • Your time matters. An investment should fit both your financial goals and the amount of responsibility you want to take on.
  • Focus on what you keep. Taxes and fees affect how much of an investment’s return remains available to spend or reinvest.
  • Understand the trade-offs. Professional management reduces your day-to-day involvement, but costs, investment risk, and restrictions on accessing your money still matter.
  • Tax-deferred does not mean tax-free. Some strategies reduce taxes today while potentially creating a larger tax bill later.

Tax-Efficient Investing Beyond Rental Properties

When people think about tax-efficient investing, real estate often comes to mind. Rental properties can offer income, appreciation, and tax advantages. But owning a property also comes with responsibilities.

Without a property manager, you’re handling tenants, maintenance, repairs, and vacancies. Hiring management can reduce that workload, but you still make decisions about the property, financing, and major expenses.

Some investors enjoy that involvement. Others already have demanding careers, family commitments, or simply prefer to spend their time elsewhere.

Buying a rental property is only one approach worth considering. There are other ways to pursue tax efficiency, including professionally managed investments that extend beyond real estate entirely.

For high-income investors who have already maximized their retirement contributions and still have money to invest, these options deserve a closer look.

Why Tax Drag Matters

The return an investment earns and the return you keep can be very different.

Consider a hypothetical investor with $1 million in a money market account earning 4% annually. That produces $40,000 of income. At an assumed combined Federal and State marginal tax rate of 40%, the investor pays $16,000 in taxes and keeps $24,000.

The 4% yield becomes 2.4% after taxes.

That ongoing cost is often called tax drag. When taxes take a portion of your investment income each year, less money remains available to compound.

This does not mean you should replace your cash reserves with investments that carry greater risk or restrict access to your money. Cash serves an important purpose. But for money intended for long-term investing, the way returns are taxed deserves attention.

The question becomes: How can you invest toward your goals while keeping more of what your portfolio earns?

1. Start With the Basics: Low-Cost Stock ETFs

Tax-efficient investing does not have to begin with a complicated strategy. A broadly diversified, low-cost stock exchange-traded fund, or ETF, can be a practical starting point.

One reason is how ETFs handle capital gains compared with many mutual funds.

When a mutual fund sells investments at a profit, it may distribute net realized capital gains to shareholders. You can owe taxes on those distributions even if you never sold your fund shares or withdrew money. Reinvesting the distribution does not eliminate that tax.

Many stock ETFs are structured in a way that helps limit capital-gain distributions. This can give you greater control over when you realize gains by selling your own shares.

ETFs can still distribute taxable dividends and capital gains. Some mutual funds are also highly tax-efficient. The important distinction is how the particular fund operates, what it costs, and what it distributes.

If you already own a mutual fund with substantial unrealized gains, the cost of selling it also matters. A more tax-efficient investment going forward may not justify a large tax bill today.

For investors who want broad stock-market exposure with relatively little ongoing involvement, ETFs are a useful place to begin.

2. Direct Indexing: More Control Over Investment Taxes

With an ETF, you own shares of a fund. With direct indexing, you own individual stocks in an account managed to approximate an index, such as the S&P 500.

That difference creates more flexibility in how investment taxes are managed.

The Market Can Be Up While Individual Stocks Are Down

An index’s return reflects the combined performance of its holdings. Even during a strong year for the overall market, some companies can lose value.

Suppose your portfolio is up for the year, but several stocks are worth less than you paid for them. A direct-indexing manager can potentially sell those positions to realize losses and reinvest in other securities while seeking to maintain similar market exposure.

Those losses may help offset realized capital gains elsewhere in your taxable portfolio.

With an ETF, you generally cannot sell the individual losing stocks inside the fund. You can only sell your fund shares. Direct indexing makes those individual positions available for tax management.

The purchases and sales must also account for wash-sale rules, including relevant transactions in your other accounts.

Where the Added Flexibility Can Help

Direct indexing may be worth considering when you have substantial taxable investments, recurring capital gains, or concentrated company stock.

For example, an executive who already owns a large amount of employer stock may want to avoid adding more of that company through an index portfolio. A direct-indexing portfolio can be customized around that existing exposure.

Professional management handles the individual-stock transactions, allowing the investor to take a more hands-off role.

Still, the added flexibility comes with costs and limitations. Management fees, differences from the index’s performance, and your ability to use harvested losses all affect the value of the strategy.

Tax-loss harvesting also often defers taxes rather than eliminating them. Selling a position at a loss and reinvesting at a lower cost basis can create a larger taxable gain in the future.

3. Real Estate Funds: Property Exposure Without Managing the Property

Direct real estate can be appealing because it combines a physical asset with rental income and potential appreciation.

Depreciation may also reduce taxable rental income without requiring an equivalent cash expense in that year. However, rental losses do not automatically offset a high-income investor’s salary. Passive-activity rules can limit their use.

Those potential benefits come with the practical responsibilities of ownership.

Direct Ownership Gives You Control

When you own a rental property, you choose the location, financing, improvements, tenants, and timing of a sale. That control can be valuable. You may know a particular market well or enjoy improving and managing properties.

But your investment may also depend heavily on one building, one neighborhood, and a small number of tenants. A vacancy or major repair can have a meaningful impact on cash flow. A property manager can handle much of the daily work, but you still oversee the investment and pay for that management.

A Fund Changes Your Role

A professionally managed real estate fund lets you invest in properties while a management team handles acquisitions, leasing, maintenance, and operations.

Depending on the fund, your investment may be spread across multiple properties, locations, and tenants. That can reduce dependence on a single property, although some funds remain concentrated in a particular region or property type.

For busy professionals, the appeal is straightforward: you can participate in real estate without personally managing rental units.

Real estate income also has the potential to grow. Leases may include scheduled rent increases, and properties may command higher rents over time. Rising expenses, vacancies, and financing costs can offset those increases, so larger distributions are never assured.

Private real estate funds also generally offer less access to your money than publicly traded investments. Redemption opportunities may be limited, and requests to withdraw may not be fully satisfied when you want them.

Publicly traded real estate investment trusts, or REITs, offer another route to property exposure, with shares that trade on an exchange. Their liquidity, price fluctuations, and distribution tax treatment can differ from private funds.

How Return of Capital Works

Some real estate fund distributions may be classified as return of capital.

You generally do not pay tax immediately on that portion if you have sufficient tax basis. Instead, the payment reduces your basis, which is used to calculate your taxable gain or loss when you sell.

For example, suppose you invest $100,000 and receive a $6,000 distribution classified entirely as return of capital. Your basis generally falls to $94,000.

If you later sell the investment for $100,000, you would generally have a $6,000 taxable gain. Once your basis reaches zero, additional return-of-capital distributions generally become taxable.

The potential benefit is postponing the tax bill, leaving more cash available to spend or reinvest in the meantime.

But return of capital is a tax classification, not a measure of investment success. A distribution can include your own invested money coming back to you. You still need to evaluate the fund’s total return and whether its payments are sustainable.

4. Infrastructure Funds: Physical Assets Beyond Real Estate

Real estate is not the only way to invest in physical assets that benefits from depreciation and tax efficiency. Infrastructure funds invest in assets that help keep the economy running, such as power facilities, transportation networks, pipelines, and communications systems.

Like real estate, these assets are built to be used for many years. Their purpose is different: they supply energy, move goods, and connect people. Some generate revenue through long-term contracts or regulated arrangements. Depending on the investment, that can support ongoing cash flow.

Why Infrastructure Belongs in the Conversation

Infrastructure can appeal to investors who want exposure to income-producing physical assets.

As with real estate, depreciation and other deductions can create a difference between the cash an investment generates and its taxable income. Depending on the fund’s structure and tax circumstances, a portion of its distributions may be classified as return of capital.

That creates another potential avenue for tax-deferred distributions beyond rental properties.

However, infrastructure funds do not all work the same way. Some emphasize current income, while others focus more on growth. Their holdings, borrowing, fees, and tax treatment can vary considerably.

Private infrastructure funds may restrict withdrawals, and their assets can be affected by interest rates, regulation, construction costs, and the financial strength of customers.

The appeal is access to a different group of physical assets without having to operate them yourself. The investment still needs to fit your goals and time horizon.

Comparing the Approaches

Approach Your involvement Potential tax advantage Main trade-offs
Low-cost stock ETFs Limited ongoing involvement Often limit capital-gain distributions Market risk; dividends and sales can create taxes
Direct indexing Individual-stock management handled professionally Tax-loss harvesting and customization Fees, tracking differences, and coordination across accounts
Direct rental property Significant without management; oversight remains with management Depreciation may reduce taxable rental income Tenant issues, repairs, concentration, financing, and limited liquidity
Private real estate funds Day-to-day property work handled by a management team Some distributions may be tax-deferred Fees, borrowing, property risk, and withdrawal restrictions
Infrastructure funds Asset operations handled professionally Some structures may provide tax-deferred distributions Fees, asset-specific risks, borrowing, and potentially limited liquidity

These approaches serve different purposes. A stock portfolio, a rental property, and an infrastructure fund should not be treated as interchangeable simply because each may offer tax advantages.

Choose an Investment That Fits Your Life

The best investment for you depends partly on how you want to spend your time.

If you enjoy finding properties, overseeing improvements, and managing a rental business, direct real estate may be a good fit.

If your career and family already keep you busy, professional management may be more appealing. You may prefer a straightforward ETF portfolio, the added tax flexibility of direct indexing, or selected real estate and infrastructure funds.

Before committing money, consider:

  • Purpose: Are you investing for growth, current income, or a combination?
  • Access: When might you need the money?
  • Cost: How much will management and other expenses reduce your return?
  • Risk: What could cause the investment to lose value or reduce its distributions?
  • Taxes: What might you owe while holding it and when you sell?
  • Time: How much responsibility do you want to take on?

A tax advantage is valuable only when the underlying investment makes sense for you.

Make Your Next Investment Dollar Work Harder

Real estate deserves a place in the tax-efficient investing conversation. So do the other options available to you.

You can build a portfolio that considers taxes without taking on the responsibilities of being a landlord. Low-cost ETFs, direct indexing, and professionally managed real estate and infrastructure funds each offer different ways to approach that goal.

The right combination depends on your finances, your priorities, and the life you want your investments to support.

At Servet Wealth Management, we help investors connect portfolio decisions with their broader tax and financial plans. If you have substantial taxable savings, let’s discuss how your investments can work more efficiently while fitting the level of involvement you want.

This article is for educational purposes and is not individualized investment or tax advice. Investments involve risk, including loss of principal. Tax treatment depends on individual circumstances and may change. Hypothetical examples are illustrative and do not represent actual investment results. Review investment and tax decisions with your financial advisor and tax professional.

About the author: Nathan Lee is a CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER® and Behavioral Financial Advisor at Servet Wealth Management in New York City. He works with individuals and families navigating important financial decisions, including retirement planning, tax strategy, investing, income planning, and wealth management. Through his blog and YouTube channel, Nathan explains complex financial topics in a practical, easy-to-understand way.

I read every email and would love to hear if this blog helped you.